My wife and I have tried several budgets, did the Dave Ramsey Financial Peace course (which was very helpful BTW) and have struggled finding something that worked for both of us. Finally have found it!
Here’s what didn’t work:
·Excel Spreadsheets – pain to keep up with but in the end only told us where the money went, didn’t change were it was going.
·Envelope System – setting aside specific amounts of money for every budget category and putting that cash in an envelope or in a separate bank accounts – not for us – never gonna happen in this house.
·Slush Fund – tried the easy way of paying for everything as normal and setting aside a “slush” fund for my wife and me so all “optional” expenditures could come out of that account. Didn’t work – the line between optional and necessary at Target and Walmart and even the grocery store gets blurred and so most everything became “necessary” and blew the budget.
What Finally Did Work: Modified Slush Fund System
We needed a system that was easy to manage – didn’t involve tracking every purchase, no crazy envelops, no spreadsheets, and all with strict rules. Sound impossible? Actually pretty easy!
In a nutshell the system involves creating a budget and separating fixed and variable expenses. The fixed are paid out of our joint checking account whereas the variable are paid out of our individual slush funds. We also have a vacation and savings account.
How to put it all together …
The 1st step is adding up all fixed expenses. Some things like gas and electricity vary over the year so best to sum up the 12 months and divide by 12 to get a monthly average. Here’re some sample fixed expenses:
·Subscriptions (online services, fitness, pest control, etc)
·Healthcare (premium or monthly known quantities)
·Donations
·Insurance (car, life, property, etc)
·Taxes (additional income, inheritance, etc)
·Car Payments / Maintenance / Tag Tax
·Child school / daycare
·Pet grooming / vet
·Eye care
·Haircuts / Grooming
2nd step is getting an approximate idea of your variable costs. (those listed below).
Variable Expenses
·Groceries (important to be here)
·Car Gas
·Shopping / Clothes
·Restaurants / Coffee
·Gifts
·Dry Cleaning
3rd step is approximating what you want to save. Look at your costs and your income then get an idea of how much you can set aside for savings, vacation, college, unexpected repairs, etc.
Savings includes a couple things:
Real savings – money we want to remain in the bank
House Repair / Maintenance
Car Maintenance
Vacation
College Fund
4th step – put it all together. Add up each group and make sure you are under your average monthly income. Go back and tweak the allotments as needed.
5th step – create the bank accounts. Create at least the following bank accounts:
·Joint checking for fixed expenses
·Slush fund checking account for each spouse (debit cards are really handy here!). This will be for your variable expenses. One spouse may get more allotment if they do the primary grocery shopping for instance.
·Savings account (can have a single account to keep it simple or multiple savings accounts for Vacation, Christmas gifts, Repairs, College Fund, etc)
6th step – setup automatic transfers. Make sure money is automatically transferred once, or better yet, twice a month to each account. I say twice a month since that will help will cash flow if you’re paid twice a month.
As an optional step see if your bank supports daily balance emails. That’s a great way to be reminded how much you have left in your slush fund. Another option is to cash out part of your slush fund each month and use cash for all your retail purchases.
Frequency is key …
A big problem we had at first was the frequency of transfers into our slush funds. We started monthly but after 3 weeks with no money left we started reverting to credit card spending. That’s bad. So we switched to semi-monthly and that has made a huge difference. It is enough money to buy larger items (like a full grocery run) but also frequent enough to get by between transfers. Weekly or bi-weekly might work too, depends on your cash flow and how often you’re paid.
Why it works for us …
It achieves our objectives of being pretty much complete automated – we do very little to no budgeting now. It needs very little tweaking – our fixed expenses haven’t changed much so there’s really nothing to change. I suppose we could change how much we donate or save, but that’s super easy to change – just adjust the automatic transfers between accounts.
The kicker is the power of the slush fund – great spending flexibility balanced with restraints. We don’t argue what we spend money on – if it’s in our slush fund we can buy it, that simple. We’ve already decided how much is going into savings, donations, vacation, etc, so the rest is gravy.
Since discretionary spending is generally what busts the budget it is the single most important area for us to control. The slush fund does just that by telling us what we have left to spend – a lot or a little – the main thing is we know where we stand and are limited by what’s available! It’s the only budget that has positively affected our purchasing decisions.
A word about credit cards …
We don’t use credit cards as much now – but no harm in using them for fixed expenses like healthcare. We just pay them off using the joint checking account or a savings account for vacation items. The trick is *not* using credit cards for variable expenses. That’s where you get into trouble.
Problem of the month: VMware ESX5 no longer supports our Dell MD3000i storage platform. So after many attempts at working around the problem finally came up with a good way of reusing this older storage.
Here are some iSCSI storage arrays now unsupported by VMware as of ESXi 5:
How to make these unsupported SANs work again in a VMware environment:
·Let’s look at possible alternate paths. VMware supports 4 back-end storage types:
oLocal Disks
oiSCSI
oFibre Channel
oNFS
·Since we are dealing with out-dated iSCSI devices the only choices are:
1.Convert iSCSI device to a local (direct-attach) disk if that is even an option with your hardware. Although you will lose shared storage capabilities so even if possible may not be desirable.
2.Use an NFS server as a middle tier between ESX and your iSCSI device.
Option #1 above is outside the scope here (and wasn’t possible with my equipment) so following up on option #2 I’ll jump ahead and say this is totally possible and can even be a super convenient alternative to iSCSI in ESX.
Need some stuff!
·Decent server to act as the NFS server middle tier. I suppose faster is better but I used a 7-year-old server and it worked well.
·Networking – generally want this NFS server to have separate NIC for each of the following. If you only have 2 NICs then probably combine NFS and LAN since the LAN connection will be lightly used.
oLAN
oiSCSI (and possibly 2 NICs for this for redundancy)
oNFS data
·And of course the NFS Software (this was the adventurous part :)
Tried a couple Windows NFS products:
·Services for Unix (SFU) – built into Windows 2003 and Server 2008.
oHad a copy of Win2003 R2 ready to go on a server that could easily be used for this project – perfect!
oAfter banging at it for quite a bit finally figured out how to make it work. Made everything anonymous (security not an issue in this environment), gave Everyone modify access on the folder. Tried to share a root drive but worked better when sharing a subfolder. Didn’t use the “User Name Mapping” stuff, not needed when access is anonymous.
oEnd of the day it was dog slow – like 1 or 2MB/s. That’s a deal breaker. Happily uninstalled it.
oSuper easy to configure – wow – refreshing after using MS NFS server.
oMuch better performance around 13MB/s. Had some trouble with a large file transfer – blew out all my mount points. Can’t have that, done here. Emailed with tech support (great support BTW) and he said they are currently working out some issues (Feb. 2012).
oA little more difficult to configure than Allegro but easier than MS SFU.
oNot good performance, around 4MB/s. Dang!
No joy in Windows world – too bad, that’s where my expertise is at. Off to Linux land …
·FreeNAS
oFrom what I could tell it doesn’t support being used as an iSCSI initiator. Next.
·OpenFiler
oSo far the best alternative, BUT I’ll echo what I read on another blog … not much info on web about this usage style of OpenFiler, unhelpful user forum, have to pay for the official documentation (which I didn’t cause I’m pretty sure it won’t cover the Open-iSCSI config).
o*NOT* easy to configure the iSCSI initiator – has to be done on the command line. Shoot me an email if you want my recipe. Using iscsiadm tool isn’t awful but not easy either.
oHave *not* setup multipathing (MPIO) with the Open-iSCSI / iscsiadm utility. Still need to figure that out. So for the time being I forced all my LUNs to run on controller 0 on the MD3000i and I only did a single iSCSI session between OpenFiler and controller 0. Bad things happened when creating additional iSCSI sessions
oBy far the fastest of any option I tried. Hit 30MB/s and could possibly go higher with faster hardware – this server is circa 2004. But I doubt the CPU or Ethernet is getting maxed out, so maybe that’s max?
oAppears to use all of the server’s RAM for a cache – cool!
Overall Performance Comparison between NFS Servers:
·Microsoft SFU: 2MB/s
·HaneWin NFS: 4MB/s
·Allegro NFS: 13MB/s
·OpenFiler: 30MB/s
This was all done on exactly the same hardware and same NFS client (ESX) so it’s a good apples-to-apples comparison.
Great news – it is working! ESX5 connects to my storage via OpenFiler NFS!
Benefits (and these are significant):
·Performance (30MB/s is fast enough for most environments – especially a disaster recovery location using older hardware)
·Shared Storage – can continue to put VMs on this shared storage and use vMotion (tested it out and vMotion works great with this config).
·Compatibility – OpenFiler uses NFSv3 which is what ESX supports. This will probably be supported long into the future.
·Reuse – put older hardware back in production or use for disaster recovery.
·Economical – OpenFiler is *free* and all other equipment was already purchased. I did spend $8.50 (plus shipping) on an Intel dual port 1000Mb/s Ethernet NIC on eBay so that I could have a dedicated interface for LAN, NFS and iSCSI.
Downside:
·OpenFiler volume management takes a bit of getting used to, but I’ve mostly got the hang of it now. Although the install is fantastic – couldn’t be easier.
·The iSCSI initiator is very difficult to setup the first time. Now that I have my secret recipe it’s a snap.
·Multipathing is super difficult to setup – haven’t gotten it working yet.
·All my LUNs have to run on a single controller since MPIO isn’t happening yet.
Here’s a peak at what it looks like to connect to an NFS volume in VMware ESX:
Here’s the ESX network configuration – each network segment (LAN and NFS) have 2 NICs assigned for redundancy:
OpenFiler Configuration
·Not completely straightforward but some good articles out there on the web for using OpenFiler as an NFS server. Here’s one I used.
·Here’s my OpenFiler System config:
·Volume Groups: I basically created 1 LUN on the storage system per Disk Group, then I created 1 Volume Group per LUN. Right or wrong my idea was to keep volumes separated in OpenFiler by storage speed (SAS vs SATA). This allows all the disk subdivision to be done in ESX.
·Shares:
·Services:
·Again, shoot me an email if you’d like my formula for the iSCSI initiator and even the OpenFiler setup steps.
Just started today doing the lemonade diet - taken from Stanley Burroughs' Master Cleanse diet. Very similar to a "juice fast".
The Diet:
* 2 tablespoons lemonade
* 2 tablespoons pure grade B maple syrup
* sprinkle of red pepper (cayenne pepper)
* 8 oz water
Drink 6 - 12 of those daily for 10 whole days! (no solid food or anything else but water)
Day 1 - Sunday 1/2/11
So far so good - I haven't passed out from hunger yet :) Been drinking one of the concoctions about every 2 hours and I honestly like the taste. Nicole tested it and said with a surprising nod "not bad".
Got a little hungry before dinner and had another drink and my hunger subsided. Nicole and I did a huge walk pushing Kaitlyn in her blue car and I felt fine.
I did take communion at church today - won't count that as cheating since it wasn't eating/drinking for nourishment - only for rememberence of what Jesus did for me.
Considering doing the salt water flush tomorrow - hmm, we'll see. If not tomorrow then definitely Tues.
Day 2 - Monday
Thought I'd be really hungry when I woke up this morning, but not really, felt like a normal morning.
Having a "limeade" blend today - pretty good - maybe a little sweeter than the lemonade. Just takes a lot more limes to make the same amount, so I'll probably go back to lemons.
So far feel totally normal today - not really hungrier or more tired, really no different, although those biscuits at the Come-N-Get-It looked really good when I went by to get a styrofoam cup.
About to wrap up day 2 - little hungry - really just want to munch some junk food while watching the Orange Bowl. I'm resisting the temptation ...
Day 3 - Tuesday
Woke up again feeling normal - not hungry, sort of surprised me.
Today was the day for the first salt water flush. Instructions say 32 oz but I recall that being almost too much. I scaled down to 24 oz and 1.5 tsp of sea salt.
Tempting fate I drank it all and then took the dogs for a walk. No problem luckily, was about 25 min. before the first "flush".
Haven't been all that hungry today. Squeezed another dozen lemons, that should be good for today and maybe 2 more days. Wised up and bought the biggest lemons I could find :)
So far feel pretty normal, wouldn't mind a snack, resisting thinking about food, but overall doing great!
Day 4 - Wednesday
Got up this morning feeling good, a little hungry so I had a juice drink before taking the dogs out. Did a little jogging with the dogs - felt good to get some exercise.
Most of the time I don't even think I'm on a diet - feel normal, not really any different. Sort of surprising.
Wrapping up day 4 and am doing fine, thinking about pizza a lot today, that might have to be my first meal when the diet is over. Fully loaded, extra crushed red pepper, I'm in!
Day 5 - Thursday
Did the salt water flush this morning, got that over with. Wrapping up day 5, half way there!
Day 6 - Friday
Woke up and had a little morning hunger for the first time. Drank some lemonade and I was good to go. Still enjoying the taste of the mixture and overall feeling great.
Only 4 days to go after today - still thinking of pizza, although driving past a billboard with a nice juicy steak looks really good too. Odd thing is that I'm not overly hungry, just miss the taste.
Day 7 - Saturday
Slept in a bit (thanks Nicole for taking Kaitlyn). Again a little hungry this morning, could have been the smell of pancakes Nicole made.
Did the salt water flush again, full 32 oz - not pleasant but all part of the detox I suppose.
For the first time on this diet starting to crave food today, miss the "full" feeling. Hanging in there, only a couple more days left!
Day 8 - Sunday
Made it thru family dinner, was pretty tempted by the homemade chilli and then strawberry cheesecake. Survived to see another diet day ...
Day 9 - Monday
Woke up to lots of snow, not really hungry, feeling fine. Overall I think I've felt as good or better being on this diet than I normally do.
Squeezed my last batch of lemons - should be plenty for today and tomorrow. Before making this last batch had thoughts of wimping out and ending the diet today, but I'm so close and since I already bought the lemons and the maple syrup I guess I'll stick it out for another 2 days.
Just read Seth's blog on pizza visit, I'm really looking forward to have an awesome pizza in a couple days!
LAST DAY!!! Did the last salt water flush this morning, glad to be done with that. Overall I feel great today. Really for the first time I noticed my pants were looser, looks like I've lost about 9 pounds.
Definitely looking forward to a change in diet tomorrow. This has been fairly easy and I've felt better and had more energy than I thought I might. Out playing in the snow yesterday and today, climbed the big hill by our house, felt fine.
Tomorrow is the slow re-introduction to foods, starting with orange juice and maybe some soup. Thursday I'll probably take it easy with some more soup and veggies. Then Friday I'm going for it! Looking forward to pizza if we're not still snowed in!
Post Diet
Came off the diet fairly quickly, by Thursday I was eating small portions of regular meals. Went and had some great pizza Friday night, it was fantastic! I can tell I'm more conscious of what I eat now, definitely aiming to eat a lot healthier going forward!
You may have seen the bumper stickers that say COEXIST with all the different religious symbols from Judaism to far-east religions to Islam to Christianity. Today we operate under the concept of religious tolerance - freedom of religion so to speak.
What does the one true God say about it? Moses quotes God directly in Exodus 34:13
Destroy their altars, break their stone pillars, and cut down their Asherah idols.
Doesn't sound like coexisting, does it? But notice that God does not tell them to persecute those people, just their religion.
Let's look at another example in 2 Chronicles 14 where King Asa follows God's command.
Asa did what the Lord his God said was good and right. He removed the foreign altars and the places where gods were worshiped. He smashed the stone pillars that honored other gods, and he tore down the Asherah idols. Asa commanded the people of Judah to follow the Lord, the God of their ancestors, and to obey his teachings and commandments. He also removed the places where gods were worshiped and the incense altars from every town in Judah. So the kingdom had peace while Asa was king.
And of course commandment #1:
You shall have no other gods before me.
So we as individuals shouldn't look to multiple religions, but as a nation should we allow multiple religions? King Asa didn't and God blessed the nation for it.
Why then did our founding fathers want religious freedom if God is opposed to other gods? If you get into their mindset and the exclusively Christian culture of the day, practicing non-biblical religions wasn't an option. Take a look at the numbers:
100% of the 200+ founding fathers were Christian. Reference here. Here's the breakdown:
97% Protestant
2% Deist (Jefferson, Franklin, Harnett)
1% Catholic
Of the deists I would say they were probably Christian and probably more Christian than average church-going Christians of today. Examples from Jefferson and Franklin:
More than half the founding fathers were Christian seminary grads.
Government buildings (US Congress) were used as Christian churches on Sundays.
It's so easy to accept or condone other religions but that's not what God wants. He wants me, He wants you, He wants our nation to turn to Him and as 2 Chronicles 7:14 says if we do that "He will heal our land".
Interesting video I saw, From a Frog to a Prince. Discusses how all natural selection and evolution we see in nature only removes information from the genome. Even an Oxford evolution advocate (Richard Dawkins) was unable to counter that point. Points out that the human genome has a thousand times more information than that of small creatures. Both natural selection and artifical selection (selective breeding) both ultimately remove information from the creature's genome.
The evolution theory wouldn't be the first time researchers have been proven wrong. See these articles about how historians or archaeologists who made claims contrary to the Bible were later proven wrong. Topics such as Moses not writing the Pentatuech (first 5 books of the Bible), or the fall of Jericho not occuring, or the Hitites not existing.
The Earth is estimated to be millions of years old (maybe billions) but creationism says the world was created per Genesis about 6000 years ago. Why the stark contrast? Why does the Bible not go into further detail about it?
One good reason is that it doesn't play a role in our spiritual lives and relationship with God. God in His infinite wisdom kept the Bible compact enough where it is possible for us to easily use and carry with us. If God went into further detail about every subject the Bible would be enormous, unwieldy, and important concepts would be obscured deep in chapters full of superfulous details (however interesting they may be). But more importantly giving too much detail of factual events could force people to believe the Bible and in God if He spelled out the historical facts, dates, places, etc. God's not in the business of coercing our beliefs, instead He gives us an opportunity to decide for Him.
While history is important (case in point the Old Testament is larger than the New), historical trivia doesn't make the cut. But that just ignores the issue, what about the facts. Can creationism still be true if facts as we know them don't line up. Of course it can. In fact every time historians and archaelogists have disagreed with the Bible they've always been ultimately proven wrong. Couple examples ... topics such as Moses not writing the Pentatuech (first 5 books of the Bible), or the fall of Jericho not occuring, or the Hitites not existing.
So what about the age of the Earth? Let's see what Genesis has to say. Gen. 1:1 says "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." Gen 1:2 says "Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.". This may have happened all at once, or it could be a very brief summary of the first couple million years of the Earth's existance.
I think looking at the bigger picture and take into account the "God - Satan" prehistoric conflict given in Isaiah 14:12-14 might help here. Satan was cast down to Earth long before Adam but probably after Genesis 1:1. Satan might have taken a third of all angels with him in his revolt per Revelation 12:4. The Earth might have been Satan's stomping ground, maybe a time to repent of his sins, but that never happened. At some point God sentenced Satan to an eternal hell for his sins. Satan being the brilliant creature he is (enough to think he was equal with God who he could see and converse with) probably challenged God's love in his condemnation. God may have given him a chance to prove his case of how a loving God could condemn his own creatures. At that point God may have restored the Earth and created man who is believed to have the same decision-making abilities as angels, angels like Satan.
Anyhow that is a theory, there are many others that are plausible. The bottom line is God didn't give us a detailed timeline of when Satan was cast out of heaven and the exact dates the Earth was formed (and possibly restored). If the Bible read like an encyclopedia there would be little room for decisions, like to repent and believe in our Savior. And it could be that every time a person by faith believes believes in our Redeemer another nail is driven into God's solid case against the accuser. But what does all that have to do with us now? Honestly I can't remember a time when I needed prehistoric knowledge to solve a real problem in my life :)
Thoughts?
5/18/10 Update:
Scientists prove the Bible correct again ... this time concerning evolution. Turns out after a DNA examination that Neanderthals are simply human with as much difference as Japanese are from Germans.
Where did this phrase "Separation of Church and State" come from? The quote below from Thomas Jefferson that is often cited by courts is his summary of the first amendment contained in a letter he wrote to the Danbury Baptist organization in Delaware shortly after becoming our third president:
Did he mean this as a one-way wall where the state is not to interfere with church but there is no restriction on religion? Let's see ... the first amendment makes it clear the government can not establish a state church. That was clearly a response to England's Anglican Church where state officials sit over the church and church officials sit in the upper chamber of their Parliament.
It also says that government can't prohibit in any way free exercise of religion. So are there not any limits on what religion can do outside of unlawful practices or other practices that would disturb the peace? It appears not. In fact if you read the whole letter in the link above Jefferson is only assuring the Danbury Baptists that the government won't interfere in any way. So there is no precedent for separation of church and state in this letter.
In fact the phase was made famous in the 1947 Everson Supreme Court case, almost 150 years after Jefferson wrote the letter. The justices embellished a bit with their interpretation saying "In the words of Jefferson, the First Amendment was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and State [that] must be kept high and impregnable. We could not approve the slightest breach." This, however, is not how Jefferson intended for his words to be used.